国元期货简一交易05.14交易策略| 联想集团将被剔出恒生指数 股价大幅下跌| 江西南昌蒋巷镇殡改:建立专项资金 做到有钱办事| 朱婷:我特别特别想家 MVP竞争输给队长不遗憾| 穆帅:我的助教有能力当阿森纳主帅 真去会支持| 3人篮球亚洲杯-中国队连韩国和伊朗 晋级八强| 詹姆斯又被黑粗翔!东决老少会一个梗过不去了| 朱婷:我特别特别想家 MVP竞争输给队长不遗憾| 特斯拉再遇撑多久之问:亏损扩大115% 产能持续跳票| 北大校长林建华出新书谈管理心得:不要怕误解| 中国人来之后 曾抛弃这些地方的西方国家“急眼”| U17冠军赛完善恒大青训体系 与强队练兵收获信心| 进攻美如画防守烂如渣 国安前场顶级也只配搅局?| 二选一致女装品类负增长?京东推分层激励吸引品牌方| 埃神:盼上港亚冠比去年成绩更好 对自己有两点希望| 魏江雷:让青少年走进体育是责任 盼足金走向亚洲| 4月多城土地出让金额创新高 北京上海交易清淡| 魏江雷:没赞助商赛事没灵魂 助雅迪达成品效合一| 果小美多地业务陷停滞 无人货架行业洗牌加速| 村民划船喂鱼落水身亡 消防开闸放水二次打捞上岸| 恒大上港同败!中超食物链形成 感谢两队精准扶贫| 巴西总统:美征收钢铝关税对巴西相关产业影响严重| 国际奥委会:北京冬奥会筹备尽显“中国效率”| 中粮期货试错交易:5月4日市场观察| 6分钟2球!国安2-1客场反超上港 朴成巴坎布齐建功| 男生踩长板挑战“天路99弯” 18分钟零失误降千米| 北大120周年校庆棋类联谊 9位世界冠军出席指导棋| 伊朗拒绝重新谈判 伊核协议存废迎关键一周| 中国企业助缅甸建仰光新城 功能类似“深圳”| 政务官微自动托管 群众咨询遭“雷人”回复| 巴菲特:我们的优势是有很多现金 希望买更多公司| 共享单车热潮已过 单车猎人热血未冷| 鲁媒:山东欲签1-2名本土即战力 预防小丁离队| 里皮:亚洲杯充满信心 换代考虑老队员是否留队| 丁俊晖赛季略显虎头蛇尾 已7年与三大赛冠军无缘| 首证!地球轨道存在40.5万年周期变化| 男子加陌生美女陷传销十日 榨干钱财后被赶走| 沃尔玛宣布160亿美元收购印度电商Flipkart 7…| 环球时报社评:希望今天是中美妥处贸易纠纷的开始| 女子用前夫死亡赔款买房 现任出资1千要求分一半| 解读阿里财报:创IPO以来最高增速后的喜与忧| 美媒谈中美磋商:美方要求换谁都不接受 更别说中国| 西太平洋银行:英国央行5月决议将按兵不动!| 翟晓川大秀健身房肌肉照 展示刻苦训练成果| 台官员发文赖清德仅给蔡英文副本 网友:拍马屁| 骑士大将抢七有望复出 詹皇苦盼他回来减压| 杨金龙杜江峰出任中国科大副校长(图/简历)| 净输590分!被詹姆斯虐一辈子但只是历史第2惨| 火勇西决票价创纪录 均价965美元甩第2一条街| 法国外长:伊核问题表明欧洲必须加强战略自主| 汶川十年 五个再孕妈妈重新孕育新生命和希望| “拒绝送货上门违规”:快递柜不再是“借口”| 羽联排名国羽仅一项世界第一 桃田贤斗逼近前十| 苏宁战亚泰海报一语双关 用青年的力量拿下比赛| 厦门遇暴雨开启“看海”模式 居民划皮艇出入小区| 逾百万土耳其民众留言“够了” 敦促埃尔多安下台| 穆里尼奥曼联的生死结!最高价双王已是两颗雷| 解放军台军和日本自卫队三方公布的画面对比(图)| 兼职猫王锐旭:破人力资源难题,灵活用工成最大风口| 广东揭阳发生致2死1伤命案 凶手系二级精神病人| 巴菲特为什么不喜欢长期国债?| 聋哑女10元中福彩880万隔1个月兑 许下3大愿望| 6000余名优秀学生获港府奖学金 额度逾1.4亿港元| 印媒:中印军方将在争议地区\"协调巡逻\" 避免肢体接…| 闹心!保罗亲哥G4险被请出场 裁判得背这口锅| 外媒:中国高科技股正重整旗鼓 跑赢美国同行| 英媒:美退出核协议 以色列梦寐以求的时刻到了?| 从大热到无力还手丁俊晖迷失了 背负压力太大了| 多机构全面剖析4月非农:美联储年内加息四次再添疑云| 阿根廷据称向IMF请求300亿美元灵活信贷额度| 中纪委官网谈历史上的监察官:狄仁杰可不只是神探| 湖南邵阳多名“蝇贪\"虚报冒领扶贫金等问题被追责| 9价HPV疫苗8天获批内地上市 赴港打针现象有望缓解| 撂挑子!名校女大学生毕业后辞去工作当专业骑手| 以色列伊朗冲突升级 各方呼吁克制唯独美国煽风点火| 北京地铁13号线(开往西直门方向)部分列车晚点| 马竞煞星:踢阿森纳我就像打了鸡血 在英超就这样| 美国人正在爱上共享单车| 卓尔向足协解释主场问题:迫不得已 希望得到理解| 美股收跌电讯板块下跌2.7% 伊朗核武问题油价收高| 新京报:诺贝尔文学奖背后的丑闻比小说还“精彩”| 中航宣传片疑似披露轰20方案 外形酷似美军B2(图)| 莎娃:不想一直排名六七十位 不喜欢一轮游| 白宫晚宴主持人开涮特朗普 嘲讽他和艳星一夜情| 足彩伤停:阿森纳铁卫无缘世界杯 皇马巴萨均有伤疑| 历史最强?勇士又平NBA纪录 巅峰公牛都压不住| 进球被VAR吹掉致无缘扳平 武磊:今天真是见鬼了!| 台当局一处用词细微变化 折射其内心惶恐不安| 谷歌年度开发者大会周四举行 人工智能再成焦点| 苹果二季度营收611亿美元高于预期 增加1000亿回购| 80岁老太被抢手镯喊保姆求救 不料抢劫的正是保姆| 京东创两周最大跌幅 业绩和指引堪忧交易员建议回避| 滴滴公关称空姐遇害案遭友商媒体抹黑:挣人血馒头钱| 韩方:未就“金特会”是否选址板门店接到美方通知| 牛汇:澳零售数据不佳 中国贸易帐趋好却难扭澳元乾坤| 崔精:决赛对手势头很猛 金彩瑛:好好备战苦手| QQ申请“滴滴滴滴滴滴”商标被驳 法院判决逆转| IMF:亚太区通胀或将持续处于较高水平| 争夺最高级赛道主动权:谁将引领智能化浪潮?| 普京7日宣誓就任俄罗斯新一届总统 开始六年任期| 特斯拉:佛州Model S车祸与自动辅助驾驶系统无关| 小米集团2017年底净负债1272亿元 累计亏损129…| 中国信通院:4月国内手机出货量3425万部 同比降16…| 蔡英文称快乐的鸡才下健康蛋 台民众:我不如鸡| 武汉9岁女童腹痛难忍 胃内发现缠成一团的毛发| 福厦线动车大面积晚点 有旅客被困车内近1小时| QQ申请“滴滴滴滴滴滴”商标被驳 法院判决逆转| 5月11日四大证券报头版头条内容精华摘要| 年轻有为!冯潇霆获第二十届广东青年五四奖章| 警察开设赌场快速致富被查:从警22年 号称一匹哥| 西安千架无人机尬舞背后:创始人称年入过亿| 中纪委机关刊披露孙政才的新“帽子”:叫“抖派”| 特朗普政府拟废除更严排放标准 加州等17州提控| 佩雷拉回应胡尔克奥斯卡是否出战 这是场平衡之战| 2018年全球数字游戏收入1253亿美元 手游占比超过…| 官媒:清除改革中“两面人” 问责改革“木偶官”| “台独”为什么嚣张?有人说实话了| 纳达尔慎谈马德里赛前景:不觉得比其他人优秀| 足协为中超设置盈亏底线 未来3年亏损不得超4.5亿| 2018城超联赛株洲两连胜 央企俱乐部展现精神风貌| 神吐槽:火箭灯泡关系破裂 啥?湖人进季后赛了?| 死者家属在医院撒纸钱与保安冲突 医闹组织者获刑| 赖清德称平均收入49889元创新高 劳工:我拖累了| 洛杉矶去年吸引中国游客数创新高| 环球时报社评:马克龙朝印太地区大秀机会主义| 英国外相与伊万卡合影 网友将其认成特朗普(图)| 俄外长:美国如果退出伊核协议不利于核不扩散机制| 清醒点别拆队啊!打不过詹姆斯的真的不止你们| 北京下周将迎新一轮污染 最高温有望达到30℃| 火箭拿下爵士!但米切尔这举动更让人挪不开眼| 郭艾伦微博晒照秀粉色手表:看好你们的女朋友| 千岛湖禁渔三个月:为爱好者辟垂钓区但禁捕胖头鱼| 贵人资本梁渊:料港股近期震荡偏好 可留意绩优股| 人民日报:“刷新闻赚零花钱”新闻App亟待加强监管| 96岁杨振宁携翁帆推新书 笑称百岁出《天大亮集》| [新浪彩票]足彩18064期任九:那不勒斯主胜可期| 快递新规正式实施 快递员拒绝送货上门属违规| 光明日报:弹幕评论别降低了审美品位| 中国与尼日利亚两国央行签署双边本币互换协议| 北京8人遭疑似流浪犬咬伤 部分家长持棍接送孩子| 星阵追求极致五十手无悬念 让先胜崔哲瀚对局分析| 头条腾讯战事升级| 金正恩:朝美领导人会晤将是“历史性会晤”| 许昕:努力在世界乒坛站住脚 让更多人喜欢直板| 特别检察官想问特朗普50个问题 全被美媒泄露了| 依赖iPhone提价的收入增长 苹果还能维持多久?| 巴勒斯坦发生示威游行活动 中使馆提醒暂勿前往| 特朗普承诺采取积极策略来推动美国药品价格下滑| 600亿美金!康卡斯特跟迪士尼拼了,加价竞购福克斯| 美国两名黑人男子在星巴克没点东西无故被捕| 德银:微博第一季度业绩符合预期 仍具市场领先地位| 谷歌语音助手进化:能否挑战亚马逊智能语音?| 黑龙江首发一出就有人断言要搏命 前9轮对手全在前10| 美国公开赛选拔赛通过多难?平均28.5人打过两关| 中纪委官网谈历史上的监察官:狄仁杰可不只是神探| 银河期货:库存降幅放缓 黑色金属反弹动力减弱| 印度这一夜发生近30年最严重反常事件 超百人死亡| 中国留学生江玥被杀案:嫌犯审判日期被推迟至下月| 商务部:中美正在就下一步经贸磋商安排保持沟通| 李保芳担任茅台董事长 身兼五职主攻企业千亿目标| 美发厅老板囚禁数十女性卖淫12年 最小者14岁(图)| 短道队“开训仪式”外教亮相 李琰与队员一起追梦| 仿佛美国改革翻版 台湾艺术教育已经彻底西化?| 国际乒联允许临时组队? 或早已知道朝韩要联手| Facebook丑闻后 Twitter被曝将数据售给同…| 新规加强送货地点要求 快递柜产品“初心”遭到拷问| 38+9+5!勇士死神拒绝悬念 统治力不输詹姆斯| 伊涅斯塔加盟中超曝光惊人条款:红酒卖了3600万| 中国金洋:恒指短期阻力50天线约30700点附近水平| 国务院批复同意将河北蔚县列为国家历史文化名城| 布沙尔排名过低无法参加马德里赛 将跌出TOP150| 澳大利亚旅游千万别喂袋鼠 因为它们有开膛的力量| 英媒:蓬佩奥非“科班出身” 或只能“听特朗普话”| 两辆FF样车运抵北京 贾跃亭造车计划迎来转机?| 印尼一座火山喷发致航班停飞 浓烟升至5500米高| 世界最早纸币长啥样?重庆首次发现“交子”造像| 日本前首相:日本政府渲染“中国威胁论”是错误| 朴廷桓原地领跑韩国 申真谞1分反超金志锡| Facebook:公开测试棋谱 让AI为全世界服务| 为数不多的兼项女骑手:我和马是“半人马关系”!| 乐视再掀“大屏生态”:勇敢者的游戏?| 马德里赛纳达尔完胜闯进八强 再创红土新纪录| 温格确认阿森纳队长休战半年 铁定无缘战世界杯| 被淘宝清理的售假商贩们都去哪儿了?去了微信| 新京报:诺贝尔文学奖背后的丑闻比小说还“精彩”| 共庆国际劳动节 中印军方在轻松气氛中边境会晤| 世乒赛首轮丁宁17分钟速胜 下蹲砍发球曾得警告| 苹果股价再创新高 万亿美元市值仅一步之遥!| 苏皇银行与美国政府达成和解 认罚49亿美元| 云南永善发生3.8级地震 市民:晃动持续了数秒| 公务员老赖贷款不还摆领导架子:都是为公家办事的| 大唐电信与高通合资公司获批:注册资本达29.8亿元| 杨震竞彩推荐:千叶主场不败 马竞单博平局| E妹吐槽|绿了卡戴珊TT罗德曼 厉害了自己都怕| 东北边境小城丹东房价2天暴涨5成 原因何在?| 美国务卿:“两国方案”是解决巴以问题可能方案| Facebook丑闻后 Twitter被曝将数据售给同…| 中纪委官网谈历史上的监察官:狄仁杰可不只是神探| 2018全球最具影响力CEO出炉:马云马化腾上榜| 最新夺冠概率火箭是勇士4倍多!骑士也没凉透| 直击|滴滴悬赏100万元寻杀客疑凶 公布司机身份信息| 谷歌语音助手进化:能否挑战亚马逊智能语音?| 足协将收录业余联赛重罚人员 提供公共查询渠道| 北京11-12日有降雨 下周前期最高温将冲破3字头| 俄今日红场阅兵有何亮点 昔日钢铁雄师力图再次崛起| 保罗狂砍41分触摸西决地板 火箭4-1淘汰爵士| 满BUFF勇士迎终极挑战! 火箭能报三年前的仇吗| 湖北34名选手跨项冬奥集训 全运体操冠军练滑雪| 首节14分打三节酱油! NBA最佛系球星肯定是他| 从索尼到任天堂 视频游戏股上升势头还能持续多久?| 联盟最稳主帅要走? 挖他可能比挖波波更难| 人民日报:让奋斗成为企业家底色| 美国白宫成立人工智能特别委员会| 巴菲特:购买比特币不是投资 是“投机”| 半夜起来就看场花球?骑蜜火蜜体验了两重天| 马斯克:下周将推出全轮驱动和高性能版Model 3| CBA外援没闲着!五位去NBA打拼 2人有机会夺冠| 伊拉克军方“诱捕”极端组织多名高级头目| 中国禁止进口洋垃圾 这个国家也快吃不消| 中国对外投资促进合作共赢 有利东道国产业结构优化| 新疆全华班打出中甲最精彩一战 水货外援坑苦球队| 山西吕梁山体滑坡现场直击:村民站院中可见灾害点| 思科收购企业级AI管理创企 金额达2.7亿美元| 安倍访问以色列:以方将协助日本培养网络专家| 他从49岁跑到60岁 刚刚破4完成波士顿马拉松| 泥头车坏停路边 一年间两车追尾该车致2死(图)| 90后“最牛”老赖 27岁欠款1.4亿元| BBC采访滴滴程维:超越烧钱竞争,建立差异化优势| “饥饿”大白鲨新西兰北岛沿岸出没 最大1条4米长| 奥瑟:梅娃依然有进步潜力 转组后有更多发言权| 开创先河!玉龙马业将办国内首场国际标准化纯血马拍卖会| CBA两大强悍外援恐令诸强垂涎 伤病是唯一顾虑| 中国智能手机海外“圈粉”无数 在欧洲成销量爆款| Facebook将允许用户删除浏览历史 但仍短暂保留数…| 男子疑因燃气表故障欠费2千多 燃气公司:必须补钱| 巴菲特回怼马斯克:技术不能解决所有问题| BBC采访滴滴程维:超越烧钱竞争 建立差异化优势| 纳达尔谈年终NO.1:不可能做到 从来都不是目标| 大帝看着御前侍卫被羞辱!绿军隔人补扣太残暴| 三星等被美国消费者告了:操纵内存芯片价格| 台书法家:台当局“去中国化”不会长久| 武汉一天内对759名快递小哥处罚 重者将被限入1年| 港股ADR妙纷高收 汇控力迫77元| 58集团CEO姚劲波:未来三年在中国服务业投入30亿美…| 台媒:大陆搞定周边外交 好腾出手对付“台独”| 前队友曝科比趣事!他竟还有个半夜2点的梗| 周评:苹果领科技股一扫阴霾 美国或将退出伊核协议| WTA排名:谢淑薇埃拉尼均上升 张帅重返TOP30| 男子300倍投擒竞彩239万:5场赛果均高于1赔4-票| 百度金融服务事业群组完成拆分 获19亿美元融资| 港股急挫500点直逼30200点 期指下试三万关| 朱婷带伤上阵仍献55%成功率 决胜局展核心实力| 女婴晚高峰时间紧急转诊 交警帮开辟“生命通道”| 虎牙四年抢得游戏直播第一股 但真正的挑战才刚开始| 美佛州高中校警未能直面凶手 遭遇难者父亲起诉| 广西千余警力出动打传销 还揪出10名“内鬼”| 新疆队设盛宴送别李秋平 新老主帅喝交杯酒| 2017年中国连锁百强出炉:格局加速改变苏宁易购居首| 摩洛哥再次宣布与伊朗断交 恢复外交关系才一年多| 正直播世乒赛女团1/4决赛 中国女团对奥地利| 奥拉罗尤解释为何拉米缺阵 赞黄紫昌仍有提升空间| 特朗普宣布美国将退出伊核协议 各方这样表态| 自闭男孩打祖母 被360斤祖父压沙发“冷静”惨死| 欧盟料将批准联合技术收购Rockwell Collin…| 北京赛车开奖

  • <tr id='n7gwtx'><strong id='btsplq'></strong><small id='vr2iid'></small><button id='5g2ooo'></button><li id='tqq76a'><noscript id='yutqih'><big id='f9p96x'></big><dt id='pkkrid'></dt></noscript></li></tr><ol id='cyxlhc'><option id='rw9fcw'><table id='ldlsfe'><blockquote id='29fqic'><tbody id='lc7bmg'></tbody></blockquote></table></option></ol><u id='tlkq70'></u><kbd id='njfg9m'><kbd id='5zzww5'></kbd></kbd>

    <code id='fbkrji'><strong id='dyu7ef'></strong></code>

    <fieldset id='ok4hyy'></fieldset>
          <span id='zv1wrn'></span>

              <ins id='yvvw9g'></ins>
                <acronym id='kkfup9'><em id='n2nbtx'></em><td id='n0x5aw'><div id='hn1n79'></div></td></acronym><address id='rmhkbw'><big id='okfc7l'><big id='2t6tlg'></big><legend id='kbbxxy'></legend></big></address>

                <i id='yuuxtp'><div id='pmh09y'><ins id='lhc9re'></ins></div></i>
                <i id='elkgxt'></i>
              • <dl id='7jfd5s'></dl>
                1. 灌云县信息港:

                  2018-05-27 23:27 来源:{网站名称}

                    灌云县信息港:

                    北京赛车计划小雪的母亲称,她只想知道是什么原因要了小雪的命。当她赶到济南时,拿到的却是学校代签字确认的死亡证明及停止抢救确认书。

                  可是不争气的我,3次手术都未能改善我的身体状况,残疾依旧,且随着年龄增长残疾日趋严重。其口径为毫米,全枪长米,采用伸缩枪托及可拆式弹匣供弹。

                    而中国在这一方面算是一个入门级的选手,要知道美国的F-22五代战机已经服役了十几年,我国的五代战机歼-20也才刚刚服役不久。“我那时确实怕了,我退缩了,不想去送命。

                    9所高校如何坚守公平性和科学性,选拔出自己青睐的高素质学生?记者为你一一梳理。其保护范围为象山县全境,保护内容包括四级非物质文化遗产代表性项目名录体系,代表性传承人名录体系以及相关的物质载体、文化场所和自然环境。

                   (图片来源:网络)【环球网报道实习记者罗言】据俄罗斯卫星网6月28日报道,俄罗斯新闻处发布消息称,从遗传学的角度来看,约20%的俄罗斯人与温莎王朝有渊源,英国女王以及尼古拉二世、法国王后玛丽德美第奇的孩子有英国王室血统。

                    自6月4日从北京出发,等待手术的过程中,母亲与郎导一同来到美国,又和女儿浪浪见了一面,祖孙三代其乐融融。

                    直到国歌结束,才匆匆跑进教室。在张小北看来,类型片要建立起电影和观众间的契约,但这种契约需要在市场的长期磨合中形成。

                    而辽宁号航母在武统台湾的战斗中最大的作用就是开到台湾东部的外海附近,提防美国会像1996年台海导弹危机时那样再次把航空母舰开来。

                    这部十六集的电视剧在故事整体设计和节奏把控上呈现出的特质,同样出现在近些年高品质英剧美剧中。《村之声》影评人BilgeEbiri评价到:“影片的效果好到令人难以置信,故事激动人心,配乐十分出色,安迪·瑟金斯凭借动作捕捉的技术再一次为我们奉献了了不起的表演。

                    另外,粉丝可以通过给相关作品投票,为喜爱的参选成员争取海量宣传曝光资源,助力总选竞选。

                    吉祥娱乐这意味着全球220余架F-35中四分之一将继续“趴窝”。

                    樊荣义今年74岁,是原泰县胜利布厂的一名职工,长期在企业从事档案、财会工作。5、历代养生专家都强调睡眠要“先睡心,后睡眼”。

                    北京赛车软件 北京赛车软件 北京赛车技巧

                    灌云县信息港:

                   
                  责编:
                  今天是:

                  2016年武汉市保护知识产权十大典型案例

                  发布时间:2018-05-27浏览:9327发布人:执法处来源:本站

                  一、李某等销售假冒注册商标的商品案

                  北京赛车评测 剧中李沁饰演的元淳是个可怜又可恨的人物,可怜之处在于虽出身高贵,但也只是权力的牺牲品,喜欢燕洵却被无情忽视,可恨之处在于最后黑化心狠手辣。

                  【案情】被告人李某在得知购买人张某所需“白云边”系列白酒的品种和数量后,向被告人周某、王某提出购买假冒的“白云边”系列白酒。而后,周某联系被告人郭某购买假冒的“白云边”系列白酒,并安排王某与郭某接洽,由郭某驾驶车辆在王某的指挥下与李某汇合,将假冒注册商标“白云边”系列的白酒最终销售给购买人张某。被告人李某、周某、王某、郭某的非法经营数额分别为32.47万元、26.805万元、23.055万元和18.35万元。

                  江岸区人民法院经审理认为,被告人李某、周某、王某、郭某明知是假冒注册商标的商品而大量购进用以销售,构成销售假冒注册商标的商品罪;遂依法作出判决:判处李某有期徒刑三年,并处罚金人民币16.5万元;周某有期徒刑二年六个月,并处罚金人民币13.5万元;王某判处有期徒刑二年,并处罚金人民币11.5万元;郭某有期徒刑二年,并处罚金人民币9.5万元。

                  【点评】该案是一起典型的侵犯商标权犯罪案。“白云边”品牌的系列文字、图像商标是相关商标权利人在我国合法注册的商标,具有很高的知名度,应受我国法律保护。这些假冒白酒流通进入市场后,不仅会侵害注册商标所有人多年建立起来的良好商誉,更直接威胁着消费者的身体健康,具有严重的社会危害性。该案的审理和判决,在于打击明知是假冒注册商标的商品而予以销售的行为,除了对行为人处以人身刑以外,还对其科以较重的罚金财产刑,使行为人因实施侵犯知识产权的行为而承担被限制人身自由及巨大经济损失的法律后果,起到惩罚犯罪和预防犯罪的作用。

                      二、芝华士控股(知识产权)有限公司[CHIVAS HOLDINGS(IP) LIMITED]、芝华士兄弟有限公司(CHIVAS BROTHERS LIMITED)诉烟台某酒业有限公司、万某侵害注册商标专用权及不正当竞争纠纷案

                  【案情】原告芝华士控股(知识产权)有限公司[CHIVAS HOLDINGS(IP) LIMITED]系第G858862A号“ROYAL SALUTE”图形商标、第3958981号立体商标、第7186027号立体商标、第7186031号立体商标以及第7186075号立体商标的所有人,并许可原告芝华士兄弟有限公司(CHIVAS BROTHERS LIMITED)使用上述商标。经持续、广泛的宣传,原告生产、销售的“ROYAL SALUTE/皇家礼炮”21年苏格兰威士忌酒,获得了较高的知名度。被告烟台某酒业有限公司在未经原告许可的情况下,在其生产、销售的“ELYSEE WHISKY”酒上使用与原告商标及商品包装高度近似的酒瓶瓶身及商品外包装。被告万某则未经原告许可,销售了上述商品。

                  武汉市中级人民法院经审理认为,被告生产、销售的涉案被控侵权产品侵害了原告第G858862A号、第3958981号、第7186027号、第7186031号、第7186075号注册商标专用权,被告擅自在其生产、销售的涉案被控侵权商品上使用与原告知名商品近似包装的行为,构成不正当竞争;依法作出判决:被告烟台某酒业有限公司与被告万某立即停止侵害并销毁涉案侵权产品;被告烟台某酒业有限公司赔偿原告经济损失人民币50万元。宣判后,原、被告均未提起上诉。

                  【点评】首先,本案涉及全球知名品牌“芝华士”。判决作出后,原、被告双方均服判息诉,未提起上诉,取得了较好的社会效果。其次,本案案情复杂。立体商标的侵权比对不同于一般平面商标,在作近似比对时,既要把握立体商标的显著特点,又要排除商标中,因商品自身性质产生的形状、为获得技术效果而需要的商品形状,或使商品具有实质性价值的形状等通用元素。最后,本案具有特殊性。系湖北省内第一起立体商标侵权案件,类似案件在全国亦不多见。

                  三、武汉小桔灯文化信息交流有限责任公司诉许某、浙江淘宝网络有限公司侵害著作权纠纷案

                  【案情】原告武汉小桔灯文化信息交流有限责任公司(以下简称小桔灯公司)是《小桔灯快速阶梯序列作文教案》的版权所有人。被告许某在未经原告授权的情况下,2018-05-27之前,在淘宝网上经营的店铺“安徽快乐书吧”内出售名为“最新小桔灯作文纸质教案特价一站式作文上课专用”的图书和其他含“小桔灯”字样的商品,如“小桔灯作文上课培训辅导”、“小桔灯作文培训”、“小桔灯全套教案”等,销售额总计约1.9万元。2018-05-27,小桔灯公司向浙江淘宝网络有限公司(以下简称淘宝公司)送达《律师函》称:淘宝网站上的“安徽快乐书吧”店铺出售的小桔灯作文纸质教案是侵权作品,要求立即停止侵权并提供“安徽快乐书吧”的经营者的信息。2018-05-27,在淘宝公司删除了“最新小桔灯作文纸质教案特价”的相关链接后,该网店继续销售含“小桔灯”字样的其他图书约1500元。2018-05-27,一审法院判决许某立即停止侵权行为,赔偿原告经济损失2.2万元;判决被告淘宝公司立即删除侵权商品在淘宝网上的链接,对许某赔偿金额中的5000元承担连带赔偿责任。一审判决后,被告淘宝公司不服,上诉至市中级人民法院。二审改判:维持一审判决有关被告许某的判项,撤销其他判项。

                  【点评】网络交易平台服务提供者按权利人通知要求删除侵权商品链接后,若有关网络用户再次实施侵权行为,平台服务提供者应否对网络用户的再次侵权行为承担连带责任,一直是网络知识产权侵权诉讼中的难点问题。互联网经济方兴未艾,而电子商务作为作为互联网经济的主要支撑,对《侵权责任法》的理解适用应当在权利人利益保护与产业发展之间作出合理的平衡。二审法院认为,对网络交易平台服务提供者对网店再次侵权行为主观认知状态的判断,应结合网络交易商品上线交易流程、商品命名管理规定以及平台制定的侵权惩处规则等要素予以综合判定,不能一概推定其应知晓卖家的再次侵权行为,进而要求其承担连带责任。这一判决将抽象的法律规定进一步具体化,较好地平衡了权利保护与互联网产业发展的需要。

                  四、陈某、张某等假冒注册商标案

                  【案情】被告人陈某、张某原分别系武汉猫人制衣有限公司(以下简称猫人公司)所属部门活力派事业部的总经理和销售经理,被告人李某系猫人公司安徽省经销商,被告人徐某系常州某针纺织品有限公司的负责人。2014年,陈某、张某、李某得知猫人公司不再向经销商提供“猫人”内衣,陈某、张某、李某三人未经猫人公司许可,商议决定自寻厂家生产“猫人”内衣。后经陈某介绍张某与被告人常某相识。常某明知张某、陈某、李某未经猫人公司许可,仍介绍张某、李某与被告人徐某相识。2014年5月至8月期间,张某、李某与常某和徐某,多次商议生产“猫人”内衣事宜。期间,徐某与李某分别以常州某针纺织品有限公司、合肥市某商贸有限公司的名义签订《针纺织品购销合同》,约定生产保暖内衣1.8万余套,货值金额138万余元。随后,徐某在未取得猫人公司授权的情况下,按照张某提供的合格证、吊牌等电子文件及李某提供的样衣,组织生产,共生产涉案产品1.8万余套,提货时李某向徐某实际支付了货款133万余元。李某先后向张某、陈某支付好处费6万元,徐某向常某支付好处费19万元。

                  江岸区人民法院经审理认为,“猫人”商标是猫人公司合法注册且在注册有效期内的商标,受我国法律保护;被告人张某、陈某、李某伙同被告人常某、徐某,未经注册商标所有人许可,在同一种商品上使用与其注册商标相同的商标,侵犯了我国的商标管理制度和商标所有人的注册商标专用权,其行为均已构成假冒注册商标罪。江岸区人民法院依法对上述被告分别判处有期徒刑、缓刑和罚金。

                  【点评】该案是一起假冒注册商标案件,其特点在于两名被告人系猫人公司的员工,五名被告人企图以合法形式掩盖非法目的,规避法律,本案所涉及的注册商标和商品具有很高的知名度。这些假冒内衣进入市场后,不仅会侵害注册商标所有人多年建立起来的良好商誉,更直接破坏市场经济秩序,具有严重的社会危害性。法院依法对五名被告人科以自由刑的同时,还对各被告人判处罚金财产刑,意在剥夺其再犯罪的能力,以此震慑此类违法犯罪行为。

                  五、周某等销售假冒注册商标商品案

                  【案情】2016年8月,飞利浦(中国)投资有限公司向公安机关举报,武汉泛海城市广场开发投资有限公司一期室内广告灯箱所使用的“PHILIPS”飞利浦牌LED灯带系假冒产品。公安机关侦查查明,2013年7月,犯罪嫌疑人周某代表武汉某公司参与武汉泛海城市广场开发投资有限公司一期室内广告灯箱设计、施工招投标工程,以133万元的价格中标并担任该项目施工方项目经理;周某为获取非法利益,私自从深圳上线某LED生产厂家李某处订购了27万元的假冒“PHILIPS”飞利浦牌LED灯带9000米,用于泛海城市广场一期室内广告灯箱项目。周某在该项目销售假冒“PHILIPS”飞利浦牌LED灯带金额达60万元。2018-05-27,公安局将周某抓获归案。

                  【点评】此案社会影响较大,荷兰驻华使领馆对此案高度关注。该案中犯罪嫌疑人周某低价购买假冒“PHILIPS”灯带并投入市场大量使用,其行为严重侵犯了国际知名品牌“PHILIPS”的知识产权。此案的成功破获表明我国依法平等保护国内外当事人在我国取得的知识产权。

                  六、武汉市某电子电器有限公司假冒注册商标案

                  【案情】2018-05-27,工商行政管理部门检查发现,位于汉阳区的武汉市某电子电器有限公司涉嫌生产侵犯“东风”注册商标专用权的商品。经查,当事人于2018-05-27购进一批标注“东风襄樊仪表系统有限公司”字样及“东风”注册商标的包装盒和小标签,在未经“东风”注册商标权利人授权情况下,擅自将该外包装及标识使用在其生产加工的汽车传感器成品上进行市场销售,违法经营额达20400元。工商行政管理部门依据相关法律规定,责令当事人立即停止侵权行为,并收缴、销毁侵权商品,罚款20万元。

                  【点评】“东风”是驰名商标,汽车配件产品涉及人民生命财产安全。当事人为了牟取不法利益,将假冒东风汽车配件标识用于购进的汽车配件产品上,严重损害了东风汽车公司和广大消费者的合法权益。为维护公平竞争的市场环境,工商行政管理部门加大了对侵犯驰名商标专用权的打击力度,为企业发展保驾护航。

                  七、周某播放电影《老炮儿》侵犯著作权案

                  【案情】2018-05-27,市文化市场综合执法支队接省新闻出版广电局《关于核处华大青年剧场涉嫌放映盗版电影的通知》后,立即组织市和区执法队伍,赶赴华中师范大学华大青年剧场开展调查。经查,华大青年剧场承包人周某未经著作权人许可,利用蓝光播放器,通过投影仪播放电影《老炮儿》,以10元/张的价格销售电影票140张。执法人员当即对该剧场相关经营情况进行取证;责令该剧场停止放映,退还票款,向观众致歉。执法部门依法作出罚款5000元的行政处罚。

                  【点评】根据我国《著作权法》的规定,《老炮儿》的著作权人依法享有放映权,即通过放映机、幻灯机等技术设备公开再现电影作品的权利。华大青年剧场承包人周某未经著作权人的授权,通过投影仪播放电影《老炮儿》,侵犯了著作权人的合法权益。市文化市场综合执法支队依法及时行使行政执法权,通过现场取证固定证据,并依法作出行政处罚,有效地维护了著作权人的合法权益,保障和促进我国电影市场的规范与繁荣。

                  八、何某等制售假冒螺纹钢系列案

                  【案情】2016年4月,根据举报,市质量技术监督局稽查局统一部署执法人员同时对位于东湖新技术开发区、洪山区的三处建筑工地使用的钢筋混凝土用热轧带肋钢筋(俗称“螺纹钢”)进行执法检查。在三处工地均发现标称武汉钢铁集团鄂钢公司生产的螺纹钢产品,分别由何某(10卷,货值金额46371.12元)、武汉某物资有限公司(5卷,货值金额23715元)、武汉某商贸有限公司(7卷,货值金额42420元)销售。经调查核实,上述螺纹钢均由三名当事人从其他钢厂购进,经过更换冒用武汉钢铁集团鄂钢公司厂名、厂址的合格证、吊牌后再销售到建筑工地。

                  市质量技术监督局依法对三名当事人分别给予行政处罚,没收假冒产品,并将案情及时通报建筑监管、公安等相关部门。

                  【点评】螺纹钢产品关系到建筑工程质量安全。市质量技术监督局积极作为,加强监管,查明情况,依法打击假冒伪劣产品,扶优治劣,防止了危害后果的发生。

                  九、武汉毳雨环保科技有限责任公司专利维权案

                  【案情】武汉毳雨环保科技有限责任公司(以下简称毳雨公司)是专利“一种塔吊喷淋系统”(专利号:ZL201320052452.5)的排他实施许可合同的被许可人。2016年10月,毳雨公司就武汉某环保公司、中铁某局第六工程公司、中铁某局股份公司涉嫌侵犯其专利权向市科技局(市知识产权局)提出处理请求,请求市科技局(市知识产权局)责令被请求人立即停止所有侵权行为、登报道歉、承诺不再侵权,拆除、查封被请求人使用的侵权产品。市科技局(市知识产权局)依法立案,执法人员多次前往被控侵权产品的安装现场武汉某大桥和某地铁工地调查取证、开展勘验;随后对案件进行了公开口头审理,查明武汉某环保公司制造了涉嫌侵犯涉案专利权的塔吊喷淋装置,并销售给中铁某局第六工程公司、中铁某局股份公司分别安装在武汉某大桥和某地铁施工现场。经过市科技局(市知识产权局)的执法人员反复做工作,当事人之间达成调解协议:武汉某环保公司给予偿毳雨公司一次性赔数,并承诺不再制造、销售、许诺销售侵犯涉案专利权的产品;中铁某局第六工程公司、中铁某局股份公司可在原施工现场继续使用已安装的塔吊喷淋装置。

                  【点评】知识产权行政机关调处专利侵权纠纷,是我国《专利法》规定的法定职责。本案中,市科技局(市知识产权局)执法人员积极履行职责,在进行调查取证、现场勘验,查清事实的基础上,通过反复协商调解,最终促成双方当事人达成调解协议。调解结案的好处是:一方面,相关权利人获得了合理的赔偿,保护了专利权和创新者的积极性;另一方面,定纷止争,案结事了,避免因作出侵权处理决定而有可能拆除塔吊喷淋装置,给环境带来不利的影响。

                    十、侵犯微软注册商标专用权和著作权案

                  【案情】2018-05-27,武汉海关住邮局办事处在对申报出口至美国的某邮包进行布控查验时发现,该邮包申报品名为“GIFT”,实际为带有“WINDOWS”标识的光盘共299张、标签100张,涉嫌侵犯微软(中国)有限公司的注册商标专用权。武汉海关随后联系权利人的代理人上海瀚元律师事务所并送达了《确认进出境物品知识产权状况通知书》。8月19日,权利人向武汉海关确认上述光盘侵犯了微软(中国)有限公司的注册商标专用权并提出了扣留上述光盘的书面申请。8月23日,权利人向武汉海关出具了《鉴定证明》,涉案的光盘及标签涉嫌侵犯其注册商标专用权和著作权,价值418301元。武汉海关驻邮局办事处通过寄件人留下的联系方式通知寄件人申报上述光盘的知识产权状况,但无法与其取得联系。12月14日,武汉海关依法决定对涉案侵权物品予以收缴。

                  点评】本案中,武汉海关贯彻落实海关总署部署,深入开展“清风”行动,积极参加海关总署在全国范围组织开展的中美海关知识产权保护联合执法行动。不仅对输入国内的侵权假冒商品进行监控,也对输住美洲国家的侵权假冒商品进行了重点监控。武汉海关驻邮局办事处对申报出口至美国的名为“GIFT”邮包,通过综合运用相关业务系统进行风险分析、集中研判、重点查验,发现其实带有“WINDOWS”标识的光盘,侵犯微软(中国)有限公司的商标专用权。这是该办事处成立以来查获案值最大的一起知识产权侵权案件,充分体现了我国海关积极主动执法保护知识产权的力度和特色。


                  Top ten typical cases of intellectual property rights protection of Wuhan in 2016

                   

                  Case NO. 1: Sales of commodities with counterfeited “Baiyunbian” trademark by defendant Li, et al.

                  [Background and Ruling]

                  After being informed of the types and quantity of “Baiyunbian” white spirit the buyer Zhang needed, defendant Li proposed to defendants Zhou and Wang that they should buy white spirit with counterfeited “Baiyunbian” trademark. Then, defendant Zhou contacted defendant Guo to purchase the counterfeited commodities and arranged for defendant Wang to approach defendant Guo. Under the direction of defendant Wang, Guo drove to join Li and finally sold the white spirit with counterfeited “Baiyunbian” trademark to the buyer Zhang. The amount of the illegal income of defendants Li, Zhou, Wang and Guo was RMB 324,700 yuan, 268,050 yuan, 230,550 yuan and 183,500 yuan, respectively.

                  The Wuhan Jiang’an District People’s Court ruled that defendants Li, Zhou, Wang and Guo bought a bulk of commodities with counterfeited “Baiyunbian” trademarks for the purpose of sales, although they had known explicitly that these commodities were counterfeited, and their actions constituted the crime of selling commodities with counterfeited registered trademarks. A judgment was made according to law: defendant Li was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment and a penalty of RMB 165,000 yuan, defendant Zhou was sentenced to two years and six months’ imprisonment and a penalty of RMB 135,000 yuan, defendant Wang was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment and a penalty of RMB 115,000 yuan, and defendant Guo was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment and a penalty of RMB 95,000 yuan.

                  [Significance]

                  This case is a typical crime of trademark infringement. The characters and images or logos of “Baiyunbian” brand are legally registered by the corresponding trademark holders and possess a high reputation nationwide, which should be protected by law in China. After these counterfeited commodities entered the market, the good business reputation of the trademark holders, which had been built for many years, was infringed. Furthermore, the counterfeited white spirit directly threatened consumers’ health and brought about a serious harm to the society. As a result of the perpetrators’ actions of intellectual property infringement, they undertook the legal consequences including both the imprisonment and penalties, which restricted personal liberty and brought tremendous economic losses. The trial and judgment of this case cracked down on the crime of selling commodities with counterfeited registered trademarks, which played an active role in punishing and preventing such crimes.

                   

                  Case NO.2: Exclusive right of registered trademarks and unfair competition disputes between Chivas Holdings (IP) Limited, Chivas Brothers Limited and a liquor-making Co Ltd in Yantai and defendant Wan

                  [Background and Ruling]

                  The plaintiff, Chivas Holdings (IP) Limited was the trademarks holder of the figurative trademark “ROYAL SALUTE” (registration NO. G858862A) and several three-dimensional trademarks (registration NO. 3858981, 7186027, 7186031 and 7186075) and permitted the other plaintiff, Chivas Brothers Limited, to use these trademarks. By continuous and wide propaganda, “ROYAL SALUTE” blended Scotch whisky (21 years old) produced and sold by the plaintiffs had gained a high reputation in the market. The defendant, a liquor-making Co Ltd in Yantai, used wine bottles and outer packaging similar to those of “ROYAL SALUTE” in their own products, “ELYSEE WHISKY”, without the permission of the plaintiffs. Defendant Wan sold the above products “ELYSEE WHISKY” without the permission of the plaintiffs as well.

                  The Wuhan Intermediate People’s Court determined that the concerned commodities produced and sold by the defendants had infringed the plaintiffs’ exclusive right to use the registered trademarks (registration NO. G858862A, 3858981, 7186027, 7186031 and 7186075), and the actions of the defendants to use similar packaging in their own commodities without the permission of the plaintiffs constituted unfair competition. The court ruled the two defendants should stop the violation, destroy related products in stock or on sale, and the liquor-making Co Ltd in Yantai should provide compensation for economic losses RMB 500,000 yuan to the plaintiffs. Neither of the parties filed an appeal after this judgment, which has come into effect.

                  [Significance]

                  Firstly, this case involved the worldwide famous brand “Chivas”. After this judgment, neither of the parties filed an appeal, which achieved a good social effect. Secondly, details of this case were complicated. Compared with the two-dimensional or figurative trademark, the infringement judgment of the three-dimensional trademark is quite different. The distinctive features of the three-dimensional trademark should be included, but at the same time, all the general elements which affected the shape of commodities should be excluded, such as the inherent properties, the technical effect or the substantive value of commodities. Finally, the case is so specific that it is the first three-dimensional trademark infringement case in Hubei Province. Similar cases are also rare throughout the country.

                   

                  Case NO.3: Copyright infringement dispute between Wuhan Xiaojudeng Culture and Information Communication Co Ltd and defendant Xu and Zhejiang Taobao Network Co Ltd

                  [Background and Ruling]

                  The plaintiff, Wuhan Xiaojudeng Culture and Information Communication Co Ltd (hereinafter referred to as Xiaojudeng), is the copyright holder of the book, “Xiaojudeng lesson plan for quick step sequence composition writing”. Before November 2, 2015, without the permission of the plaintiff, defendant Xu, the operator of an online shop “Anhui Happy Book Bar” on Taobao.com, had been offering books called “Latest Xiaojudeng paper lesson plan for composition writing - special offer for one-stop composition class” for sale, as well as several other commodities including the Chinese characters of “Xiaojudeng”, such as “Xiaojudeng training guidance for composition class”, “Xiaojudeng training for composition writing” and “Xiaojudeng lesson plan (Full set)”, et al. The sales had totaled approximately RMB 19,000 yuan. On October 20, 2015, Xiaojudeng sent a lawyer’s letter to Zhejiang Taobao Network Co Ltd (hereinafter referred to as Taobao), saying that “Latest Xiaojudeng paper lesson plan for composition writing - special offer for one-stop composition class” sold in the online shop “Anhui Happy Book Bar” on Taobao.com were infringing works, and this violation should be stopped immediately and detailed information of the shop operator should be offered. Then, Taobao deleted the links related to “Latest Xiaojudeng paper lesson plan for composition writing” on its website on November 2, 2015. However, this online shop continued to sell other books including the Chinese characters of “Xiaojudeng” and the total sales reached RMB 1,500 yuan. On May 3, 2016, the first-instance court ruled that defendant Xu should stop this violation and provide compensation for economic losses RMB 22,000 yuan to the plaintiff, and defendant Taobao should delete the links of these infringing books on the website of Taobao.com and pay RMB 5,000 yuan out of the above penalty since it should be held accountable for assistance in the infringement. Taobao refused to accept the ruling and instituted an appeal to Wuhan Intermediate People’s Court. The second-instance court upheld the original decision related to defendant Xu and canceled those related to Taobao.

                  [Significance]

                  After the provider of online trade platform service deletes the related links of the infringing commodities for sale at the request of the right holder, if the seller commits violations repeatedly, whether the provider should be held accountable for assistance in this infringement has been always a difficult problem in the network intellectual property infringement litigation. Currently, the Internet economy is now in the ascendant and e-commerce has become the main support. Consequently, the understanding and application of “Tort Liability Law” should find a reasonable balance between the protection of the interests of the right holder and the development of the prosperous Internet industry. The second-instance court held that, to judge whether or not the provider of online trade platform service had a subjective cognition of the shop’s repeated violations, several key elements should be coherently considered to make a comprehensive conclusion, such as procedures for commodities online trading, administrative regulations of online commodity naming and tort punishment rules instituted by the online platform. It was unfair for the online platform providers to be presumed to know the shop’s repeated violations and then bear joint liability. This judgment makes a successful transition of the law from abstraction to concretization and strikes a balance between the rights protection and the development of Internet industry.

                   

                  Case NO. 4: Counterfeiting registered trademark “Miiow” by defendants Chen and Zhang, et al.

                  [Background and Ruling]

                  Defendants Chen and Zhang were the former general manager and sales manager of the business division of Wuhan Miiow Garment Limited (hereinafter referred to as Miiow), respectively. Defendant Li was the dealer of Miiow in Anhui Province. Defendant Xu was the head of a textile Co Ltd in Changzhou. In 2014, defendants Chen, Zhang and Li heard that Miiow had stopped offering Miiow underwear to the dealer. Without the permission of Miiow, the three defendants decided to find a clothes manufacturer by themselves to produce Miiow underwear. Then, defendant Zhang was acquainted with defendant Chang by the introduction of defendant Chen. Defendant Chang further introduced defendant Xu to defendants Zhang and Li, although he was fully aware that the three defendants did not obtain the permission of Miiow. From May to August in 2014, defendants Zhang, Li, Chang and Xu discussed the details of Miiow underwear manufacture several times. In this period, defendants Xu and Li signed a contract for purchases of knitwear and textile products in the name of the textile Co Ltd in Changzhou and a commercial and trading Co Ltd in Hefei, respectively. This contract agreed upon the production of thermal underwear, of which the suit number was over 18,000 and the total value was over RMB 1,380,000 yuan. Subsequently, without the authorization of Miiow, defendant Xu organized the production of thermal underwear in accordance with the electronic documents such as certificates and tags provided by defendant Zhang, and the sample underwear provided by defendant Li. For all the counterfeited underwear of Miiow trademark of over 18,000 suits, defendant Li paid more than RMB 1,330,000 yuan to defendant Xu when taking delivery. Besides, defendant Li paid defendants Zhang and Chen off successively with a total amount of RMB 60,000 yuan, and defendant Xu paid defendant Chang off with a benefit of RMB 190,000 yuan.

                  The Wuhan Jiang’an District People’s Court ruled that Miiow trademark was legally registered by Miiow and was still in the term of validity, which should be protected by law in China. Defendants Zhang, Chen and Li in collusion with defendants Chang and Xu, used the same trademark “Miiow” in the same type of commodities without the permission of the trademark right holder. This action violated the trademark management system in our country, infringed the exclusive right of registered trademark of the right holder and constituted the crime of counterfeiting the registered trademark. The defendants hereinbefore were sentenced to imprisonment, probation and penalties, respectively.

                  [Significance]

                  This case is a crime of counterfeiting registered trademarks. Its characteristic lies in the fact that two of the defendants were employees of the registered trademark right holder, Miiow. Five defendants intended to cover up their illegal purpose in a legal form to get round the law. Moreover, the registered trademark and its relevant commodities involved in this case had a high reputation in the market. After these counterfeits entered the market, the good business reputation of the trademark holder, which had been built for many years, was infringed. Furthermore, these counterfeits directly disrupted the order of the market economy and brought about a serious harm to the society. The court sentenced the five defendants to both imprisonment and penalties, aiming to deprive their ability to commit another crime and thus deter illegal crimes of the same kind.

                   

                  Case NO. 5: Sales of commodities with counterfeited PHILIPS trademark by defendant Zhou, et al.

                  [Background and Ruling]

                  In August 2016, PHILIPS (China) Investment Co Ltd reported to the public security organ that “PHILIPS” LED strip lights used by Wuhan Oceanwide City Square Development & Investment Co Ltd in the first-phase indoor advertising light boxes were counterfeited commodities. According to the investigation of the public security organ, defendant Zhou, on behalf of a company in Wuhan, participated in a project bidding of design and construction of Wuhan Oceanwide City Square Development Investment Co Ltd in July 2013. He won the bidding at a price of RMB 1,330,000 yuan and worked as the project manager. In order to obtain illegal benefits in this project, Zhou ordered counterfeited “PHILIPS” LED strip lights of 9000 meters from a LED manufacturer Li in Shenzhen with a total value of RMB 270,000 yuan. These LED strip lights were then utilized in the first-phase indoor advertising light boxes of Oceanwide City Square. However, the income that defendant Zhou earned by selling these counterfeited strip lights in this project reached RMB 600,000 yuan. On August 16, 2016, the bureau of public security arrested Zhou and brought him to justice.

                  [Significance]

                  This case was highly concerned by the Netherlands Embassy and Consulates in China and had great social effects. In this case, defendant Zhou bought in large stocks of counterfeited PHILIPS LED strip lights at a low price and put them into the market for mass use. This behavior seriously infringed the intellectual property rights of the famous international brand, PHILIPS. The successful crack-down of this case indicates that in China, foreign litigants enjoy the same protection on intellectual property rights with domestic litigants.

                   

                  Case NO. 6: Counterfeiting registered trademark “Dongfeng” by an electronic appliance Co Ltd in Wuhan

                  [Background and Ruling]

                  On June 21, 2016, the industrial and commercial administrative department inspected that an electronic appliance Co Ltd located in Hanyang District of Wuhan was suspected of manufacturing counterfeited commodities with registered trademark “Dongfeng”, which infringed the exclusive right to use the registered trademark “Dongfeng”. The further investigation revealed that this electronic appliance company purchased a batch of packing boxes and labels marked with “Dongfeng Xiangfan Instrument System Co Ltd” and the registered trademark “Dongfeng” on April 20, 2016. Without the permission of the right holder of the “Dongfeng” registered trademark, these packing boxes and labels were used in the automobile sensors manufactured and marketed by this electronic appliance company. The illegal business income totaled RMB 20,400 yuan. According to law, the industrial and commercial administrative department ordered the company to stop the violations immediately and pay a penalty of RMB 200,000 yuan for the tort. The infringing counterfeited commodities were confiscated and destroyed.

                  [Significance]

                   “Dongfeng” is a nationwide well-known trademark and its automobile accessories are closely related to people's lives and property safety. In order to seek illegal interests, the litigant used the counterfeited labels marked with “Dongfeng” trademark on the automobile accessories, which seriously damaged the rights and interests of both Dongfeng Motor Corporation and the consumers. In order to maintain a fair competitive market environment and escort the enterprise development, the industrial and commercial administrative department has devoted greater efforts to crack down on the infringement of the exclusive right to use well-known registered trademarks.

                   

                  Case NO. 7: Infringement of the copyright of the movie “Mr. Six” by contractor Zhou

                  [Background and Ruling]

                  On January 30, 2016, as soon as the municipal cultural market comprehensive law enforcement detachment received “Notice about checking and handling the suspicion of pirated movie screening in the Huada Youth Theatre” from Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television of Hubei Province, the detachment immediately organized the municipal and district-level law enforcement team to rush to the Huada Youth Theatre in Central China Normal University and conduct an investigation. The investigation found that the contractor of the theatre, Zhou, screened the movie “Mr. Six” by a blue-ray player and a projector and sold 140 tickets at a price of RMB 10 yuan per ticket without the permission of the copyright holder of this movie. The law enforcement officers gathered evidence about the business operations of this theatre and ordered the theatre to stop screening the movie, refund the ticket price and apologize to the audience. A penalty of RMB 5,000 yuan was made to the theatre as an administrative punishment according to law.

                  [Significance]

                  According to the “Copyright Law” in China, the copyright holder of the movie “Mr. Six” has the right to screen, which means playing the movie through a projector, a slide projector or other technical equipment. The theatre contractor Zhou screened the movie by a projector without the permission of the copyright holder of the movie, which violated the legitimate rights and interests of the copyright holder. The municipal cultural market comprehensive law enforcement detachment exercised the right of administrative enforcement timely and made the administrative punishment based on the scene evidence according to law. This enforcement effectively safeguarded the legitimate rights and interests of the copyright holder, protected and promoted the standardization and prosperity of Chinese movie market.

                   

                  Case NO. 8: Manufacturing and sales of counterfeited screw-thread steel by defendant He, et al.

                  [Background and Ruling]

                  In April 2016, according to the masses report, the municipal bureau of quality technical supervision and inspection deployed enforcement officers to conduct a law enforcement inspection of the hot rolled ribbed bars used in the steel concrete (known as “screw-thread steel”) in three construction sites located in East Lake High-Tech Development Zone and Hongshan District. It was revealed that screw-thread steel products marked with “Egang Company of Wuhan Iron and Steel Group” were found in all the three construction sites, which were supplied by defendant He (10 volumes with a total value of RMB 46,371.12 yuan), a materials Co Ltd in Wuhan (5 volumes with a total value of RMB 23,715 yuan) and a commercial trading Co Ltd in Wuhan (7 volumes with a total value of RMB 42,420 yuan). After further investigation and verification, it was verified that the screw-thread steel products aforementioned were purchased from another steel mill rather than Egang Company of Wuhan Iron and Steel Group and sold to the three construction sites after the illegal replacement of the counterfeited certificates and labels marked with the plant name and address of “Egang Company of Wuhan Iron and Steel Group”.

                  The municipal bureau of quality technical supervision imposed administrative penalty on the three litigants according to law and confiscated the counterfeited products. The details of the case were then reported to the departments concerned such as the construction supervision department and the public security organ.

                  [Significance]

                  Screw-thread steel products are closely related to the quality and safety of the construction projects. The municipal bureau of quality technical supervision played an active role in strengthening the supervision and cracking down the counterfeited and substandard commodities. This forceful supervision supported and protected the superior enterprises and cleaned up the inferior ones, and thus prevented the occurrence of harmful consequences.

                   

                  Case NO. 9: Enforcement of the patent rights of Wuhan Cuiyu Environmental Protection Technology Co Ltd

                  [Background and Ruling]

                  Wuhan Cuiyu Environmental Protection Technology Co Ltd (hereinafter referred to as Cuiyu) is the patent licensee of the exclusive right to use the patent “Spraying system of tower crane” (Patent NO. ZL201320052452.5) in the license contract. In October 2016, Cuiyu put forward a request to Wuhan Science and Technology Bureau (Wuhan Intellectual Property Bureau) about the infringement of its patent right by an environmental protection company in Wuhan, the sixth engineering company of China Railway Group and a corporation of China Railway Group. Cuiyu asked Wuhan Science and Technology Bureau (Wuhan Intellectual Property Bureau) to order the three companies to stop the violations immediately, make a written apology in the newspaper to promise no further infringement, and dismantle and seal up the infringing commodities. The case was then filed according to law by Wuhan Science and Technology Bureau (Wuhan Intellectual Property Bureau). Law enforcement officers made numerous trips to the installation sites of the infringing products, a bridge in Wuhan and a subway construction site, for investigation and evidence collection. A public oral hearing was held afterwards. It was revealed that the environmental protection company in Wuhan manufactured the infringing spraying systems of tower crane, and sold these spraying systems to the sixth engineering company of China Railway Group and a corporation of China Railway Group, respectively, for installation in the bridge and subway construction sites. Through the repeated mediation of the officers of Wuhan Science and Technology Bureau (Wuhan Intellectual Property Bureau), the two parties reached a mediation agreement, which ruled that the environmental protection company in Wuhan should make a one-time payment to Cuiyu and promise not to manufacture, sell or offer to sell the relevant products infringing the patent right, and the sixth engineering company of China Railway Group and a corporation of China Railway Group could continue to use the spraying systems installed in the construction sites.

                  [Significance]

                  According to the “Patent Law” in China, mediating the patent infringement disputes is the statutory responsibility of the intellectual property administrative organs. In this case, the officers of Wuhan Science and Technology Bureau (Wuhan Intellectual Property Bureau) performed their duty actively and eventually brought about a mediation agreement through repeated mediation on the basis of comprehensive investigation and evidence collection. The conciliation act was beneficial to both sides. On one hand, the patent right holder received a reasonable compensation, and the patent right and the enthusiasm of patent inventors were protected. On the other hand, the conciliation avoided the demolition of the installed spraying systems, which would bring an adverse effect on the environment.

                   

                  Case NO. 10: Infringement of the copyright and the exclusive right to use the registered trademark WINDOWS of Microsoft

                  [Background and Ruling]

                  On July 13, 2016, the Wuhan Customs Agency in the post office found a suspicious parcel whose declare name was “GIFT” while checking and inspecting the parcels exported to the United States. Actually, the parcel contained 299 CDs and 100 tags marked with the logo “WINDOWS”, which were suspected of infringing the exclusive right to use the registered trademark of Microsoft (China) Co Ltd. The Wuhan Customs then contacted the agent of the right holder, Shanghai Hanyuan Law Firm, and delivered “Notice of confirmation of the intellectual property rights status of import and export goods”. On August 19, the right holder confirmed to the Wuhan Customs that the CDs in the parcel infringed the exclusive right to use the registered trademark of Microsoft (China) Co Ltd, and proposed a written application to detain the related CDs. On August 23, the right holder issued an identification certificate to the Wuhan Customs, noticing that the related CDs and tags in this case infringed the copyright and the exclusive right to use the registered trademark with a total value of RMB 418,301 yuan. The Wuhan Customs then informed the sender of the parcel to declare the intellectual property rights status through the address left by the sender, but failed to get in touch with the sender. On December 14, the Wuhan Customs confiscated the infringing good involved in this case according to law.

                  [Significance]

                  In this case, the Wuhan Customs implemented the “Fair Wind Action” launched by the General Administration of Customs and took an active part in the nationwide collaborative enforcement action to protect the intellectual property rights between the China Customs and the United States Customs. This collaborative action not only supervised the infringing counterfeited commodities imported to China, but also focused on the commodities exported to the America. By using the operation system comprehensively, the Wuhan Customs Agency in the post office made a risk analysis and a well-targeted inspection of the parcel named “GIFT” exported to the United States, and found that it actually contained CDs marked with the logo “WINDOWS”, which infringed the exclusive right to use the registered trademark of the right holder Microsoft (China) Co Ltd. The amount of money involved in this case was the largest among the intellectual property infringement cases since the establishment of this agency. This case has fully reflected the intensity and characteristics of the law enforcement of China Customs in the intellectual property rights protection.





                  平泉县信息港 文安县信息港 东山县信息港 衡南县信息港 凉城县信息港 明光市信息港
                  莱芜市信息港 梅县信息港 依安县信息港 扬中市信息港 凤阳县信息港 杭州市信息港
                  松阳县信息港 淇县信息港 临湘市信息港 鄂托克前旗信息港 西平县信息港 科尔沁左翼中旗信息港
                  衡水市信息港 兴安盟信息港 彰武县信息港 柘荣县信息港 黄石市信息港 梨树县信息港
                  武川县信息港 太湖县信息港 滦县信息港 五大连池市信息港 北安市信息港 江油市信息港
                  民权县信息港 东莞市信息港 项城市信息港 遂昌县信息港 临安市信息港 休宁县信息港
                  彭水苗族土家族自治县信息港 科尔沁信息港 鄂温克族自治旗信息港 湄潭县信息港 梅河口市信息港 宁河县信息港
                  汉寿县信息港 壤塘县信息港 虹口区信息港 长丰县信息港 安达市信息港 阿坝县信息港
                  山阴县信息港 景县信息港 临朐县信息港 清新县信息港 东安县信息港 玉环县信息港
                  闽侯县信息港 郁南县信息港 东山县信息港 郓城县信息港 玉山县信息港 夏县信息港
                  松潘县信息港 宾县信息港 禹州市信息港 淳安县信息港 西平县信息港 梅县信息港
                  黑水县金川县信息港 阿拉善盟信息港 织金县信息港 大新县信息港 漳平市信息港 余江县信息港
                  奈曼旗信息港 保定市信息港 长汀县信息港 宜兴市信息港 苍山县信息港 伊金霍洛旗信息港
                  应城市信息港 娄底市信息港 江门市信息港 南京市信息港 林甸县信息港 壤塘县信息港
                  丰宁满族自治县信息港 通道侗族自治县信息港 潮州市信息港 巴马瑶族自治县信息港 奉节县信息港 无为县信息港
                  泰州市信息港 稷山县信息港 马鞍山市信息港 清远市信息港 靖安县信息港 咸丰县信息港
                  西充县信息港 深圳市信息港 南平市信息港 萍乡市信息港 滑县信息港 张家口市信息港
                  额尔古纳市信息港 永城市信息港 顺平县信息港 惠来县信息港 丹寨县信息港 察哈尔右翼前旗信息港
                  华容县信息港 新绛县信息港 南宁市信息港 淮安市信息港 恭城瑶族自治县信息港 瑞金市信息港
                  莘县信息港 应城市信息港 逊克县信息港 巴中市信息港 垣曲县信息港 奉化市信息港
                  大同市信息港 望江县信息港 蒲县信息港 孝感市信息港 武川县信息港 北碚区信息港
                  青浦区信息港 保亭黎族苗族自治县信息港 正安县信息港 依安县信息港 叶县信息港 仪陇县信息港
                  祁县信息港 永济市信息港 环江毛南族自治县信息港 承德市信息港 阳谷县信息港 阿尔山市信息港
                  沙河市信息港 来凤县信息港 闽侯县信息港 遂川县信息港 都安瑶族自治县信息港 石门县信息港